*** Indico will be down for maintenance on Fri 8th Nov 7:00-9:00 CET (German Timezone) ***
Remote participation:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ps-cGQyKNsYTObCr5Kqu58bXBNQdH45Fjpz5QD0hLB0/edit?usp=sharing
NC: We need to fix statement in the wiki on which NEMO (CPO or IDS) is most recent
NC: Difference found in B-field.
AP: Distinguish ion and electron sources?
TJ: No
JF: How long times were simulated?
NC: 3s
JF: How often did you update the equilibrium?
DY: The equilibrium was updated during initialisation and then kept static.
JF: Was fast pressure included in the equilibrium calculations?
TJ: Not in ETS-6.
DY: Not sure if there’s fast pressure on input.
JF: Should we disable NEMO?
RC: “I’ve had lots of problems with NEMO in ETS-5 but Mireille refuses to maintain CPO version”
TJ: NEMO may still be useful in JET, where the beam look different.
JF: ETS-6 seems to be working!
TJ: Do you think an ETS-6 simulation with sources and transport coefficients from JINTRAC could be a good benchmark against JINTRAC?
JF: Good idea! We’ve done many similar studies in the past. Usually you find differences in conventions etc, and we may need to discuss with the JINTRAC team to understand these.
---
NC: Nathan Cummings
AP: Alexei Polevoi
JF: Jorge Ferreira
DY: Dmitriy Yadykin
TJ: Thomas Jonsson
RC: Rui Coelho
TJ: We have an ETS-6 training at the end of November. Before this Pär is planning a sprint on ETS-5, and the ETS-6 training would be a continuation on the ETS-5 one. We need to announce both training asap.
TJ: What sprints do we need to prepare for the training?
DC: We need to prepare a number of use-cases for training session:
DY: I plan to release ETS-5 with FoPla later tonight.
JF: This is needed for the EWE sprint.